Topic
3 replies Latest Post - ‏2011-05-13T14:38:46Z by 命题 杨
Sunil Raveendran
Sunil Raveendran
1 Post
ACCEPTED ANSWER

Pinned topic Why Filenet P8 didn't do well in Gartner Magic Quadrant -2010 ?

‏2010-10-30T10:25:17Z |
 
 
 
 Thanks Sunil.
Updated on 2011-05-13T14:38:46Z at 2011-05-13T14:38:46Z by Eric Vonheim
  • Burton Boucher
    Burton Boucher
    6 Posts
    ACCEPTED ANSWER

    Re: Why Filenet P8 didn't do well in Gartner Magic Quadrant -2010 ?

    ‏2011-02-04T14:27:07Z  in response to Sunil Raveendran
     Sunil, I agree with you. It's a matter of definition and fit for that defined purpose. My opinion is that IBM BPM has more capability end to end than any other company. The seems to have been some agreement by analysts on the definition of BPM. These days BPM tends to mean more about data centric transactional systems integration engines. Clearly this is not where FileNet BPM fits. This is why, I believe, the analysts have coined a new market segment called "Dynamic Case Management", "Automated Case Management", or "Advanced Case Management". This is the segment that IBM Case Manager and FileNet P8 5.0 clearly fit in. This is not reflected in the Gartner 2010 Magic Quadrant.
  • This reply was deleted by Eric Vonheim 2011-05-12T21:46:25Z.
  • This reply was deleted by Eric Vonheim 2011-05-13T14:38:46Z.