• Add a Comment
  • Edit
  • More Actions v
  • Quarantine this Entry

Comments (13)

1 SUSAN BUSH commented Permalink

Interesting! I was shocked at Yahoo's recent demands, so much so, that I have wondered if Yahoo was doing this as a clever way to force reduncancies?!

 
As a mother of 4 children under 8, working from home is crucial to my ability to stay in the workforce. No that does NOT mean that I sit on my computer and yell at children while they run around or put them in front of the TV to keep them quiet. What it means is, on days they are at care, I can get some uninterrupted work done at home (and throw a load of laundry in the dryer). It means that I can stay at home and WORK when one of my children is ill, rather than cancelling the entire day and taking sick leave. It means that I can do EXTRA work at night from home, writing presentations and answering emails so my time IN the office is filled productively with collaboration and meetings. It means that I can attempt really achieve the balance that we all strive for. The flexibility also makes me loyal to the company and endeavour to always strive to meet my objectives regardless of location...
 
I can't WAIT to see what happens at Yahoo and I wonder if the honest outcomes will be reported. I also hope that the employees that are forced to a job on-premise will by default, REFUSE to answer emails or phone calls out of the work environment.. fair is fair.

2 KHALID RAZA commented Trackback

IBM allows several categories of employees to work from home. For many others, it’s flexible, with managers taking the call. With this new freedom, comes a new set of responsibilities, which can make or break your impression and career too. Employees, who work from home, need to be extra careful about perception-management now than ever before. When people do not see you at work every day, they form their opinions based on nothing and that can be detrimental. Sometimes it is perceived that employees, who work from home, do not work at all. Read More: https://ibm.biz/Bdxabj

3 Joyce Davis commented Permalink

Great post, Martin. I think a smart company is one that understands that work environment affects people very differently and that providing flexibility can be the best solution. Organizations who mandate 'in-office only' need to make sure they're goals (e.g. face-to-face interactions) are being met. I find it disappointing to hear when someone spends a hour driving into the office only to stay on the phone all day in conference calls!

4 MARTIN KEEN commented Permalink

Thanks for the great comments -- this is such an interesting area of discussion.

 
Susan -- This is something I'd like to look at more -- the possibility that the flexible hours of working from home leads to employees actually working longer hours (spread more throughout the day). That certainly sounds like the case for you.
 
Khalid - I think the CTrip study backs up what you are saying -- that remote workers can sometimes be out of sight, out of mind, affecting them negatively when it's time to think about who in a team should be promoted. It seems the key is to stay in communication with your manager and team in other ways, such as with the many social business tools discussed in this IBM Social Business Insights blog.
 
Joyce -- Flexibility is almost certainly the best solution for most companies, recognizing different working arrangements work better for different people. For all the benefits of working from home, one quarter of respondents in our poll said working from the office was best for them. To mandate that every single person should work from home, or work from the office, is unlikely to the the optimum solution.

5 Stacy Lieder commented Permalink

Martin, terrific article. It troubles me that the WAH employees, while more productive and less expensive, were promoted at such a disproportionately low rate. I must say, though, the lack of promotions for WAH employees does seem to align with my personal, if anecdotal, observations.

 
I have been a WAH employee for over 10 years, since my department "encouraged" most folks in my job to work from home. For me, it has been a very good thing, and has provided the flexibility I need to be a productive worker. My job tends to be interrupt-driven, and I find I am better able to be "hyper-focused" on critical customer issues when I am at home. Also, I tend to be more creative in the evening, and so I tend to do some work late into the night, and working from home allows me to stay up later, and sleep later, and still be working at a "decent" hour.
 
Additionally, because my particular job only requires I have internet and cell phone access, so in recent years, when my parents (who live in a different city) have been ill or hospitalized, I felt like I was better able to balance personal demands with work responsibilities; I don't have to "drop everything" at work to help my parents, but instead I have able to be there for my parents, and still meet my work commitments, because I don't have to be at the office, and other than conference calls, I can do my work any time of the day, as long as it is completed when it needs to be completed. This freedom has truly been a godsend for me and my family.
 
The increase in the power and capabilities of mobile devices has positively impacted me as well, though I will admit to having to work on the "work/life balance" part of the equation though; I tend to get caught up in things, and work more hours than I realize some days or weeks because of hot issues. I had to institute a rule not to look at my work smartphone when eating dinner out with my family, because work was truly encroaching on personal time. (Although I think this particular challenge presents to anyone with a smartphone, regardless of typical work location.)
 
I do think the whole "sick days" concept is a challenge for WAH employees; I have been on calls with colleagues who were ill and had no business joining calls, who lost their voices, and got bronchitis or pneumonia because they did not take "sick time" when they got sick. I've done it myself, because there is the perception that working from home is "easier", or "it's just a conference call"; the big reason for staying home - to keep from spreading germs through the office - no longer applies.
 
Finally, I will say this: working from home works for me, and apparently for a lot of other people as well. I think companies who recognize that some jobs, and people, are more suited toward working from home, and who give people options, not mandates, will reap the benefits of happier, more productive, more loyal employees.

6 MARTIN KEEN commented Permalink

Stacy -- thanks for sharing your extensive experience of being a WAH employee. It's good to hear examples of how WAH provides you with flexibility to fit work around your personal circumstances without negatively affecting either one. A "no smart phones at the dinner table" rule is a very good idea!
One thing I hadn't considered until you mentioned it was sick days. WIB - Working In Bed -- is an all-too-easy option for folks who are used to working at home anyway, and it's probably not the best path to a speedy recovery!

7 Keith Brooks commented Permalink

Martin,
My instinct tells me the end is near for Yahoo. This was a defensive move against, costs, employees and possibly projects that dragged on.
On the other hand, if this makes internal people go back to what made Yahoo great, I am all for it.
As a person that lives in South Florida, rare are the jobs i get offered which I can stay in South Florida. Even yesterday had a call about a role in Virginia.
I have been working from home since 96 off and on for the most part. Sometimes on site or at a client's but in general remote working, which is good and bad. Flexibility is very key. Down side is a lack of awareness sometimes to what else is going on around town or in business.
I can read feeds and tweets but the lack of business discussions does hurt i have found.

8 Grant Lindsay commented Permalink

In a previous employment situation, I went into the office everyday. There were many days in which I saw no coworker nor interacted with any colleague except through technology (e.g., phone, email, or Sametime.) One day, as a sort of experiment, I spent a few hours in the middle of the day working from a nearby cafe that had WiFi. When I returned to my cubicle, no one asked where I had been or even hinted that I had been missed. I didn't NEED to be in the office every day or even most days.

 
On the other hand, "face time," if practical, is also important. Balance and flexibility are the keys. Working exclusively from home can seem isolating for some, making them less happy and less productive. For others (like me,) the impromptu "water cooler" meetings in the office, which are touted by the we-must-be-in-the-office crowd as the driver of innovation, are distracting. I find that these conversations are often not about work, but about kids, pets, hobbies, or other non-productive topics.
 
I currently work from home 4 days a week, with (usually) one day in the office per week, sometimes more. I'm thankful that my employer sees the value in the balance of that.

9 Ian Leonard commented Permalink

Seems this research at the London Business School concurs with the CTrip findings too on promotion. Seems "presenteeism" is still a criteria for promotion.

 
https://ibm.biz/BdxGwq
 
Cheers,
Ian

10 Megan Irvine commented Permalink

I am definitely more productive from home. Since I gave up my office in the city, I have taken on greater challenges and more responsibility. I have more confidence in my ability to get things done because I have greater flexibility, control over my work environment, and more time to be productive. Because I also travel for work, I'm used to being able to work from any location. It would be really hard for me to go back to the daily commute, rush hour traffic, fluorescent lights, cubicles, etc.

11 MARTIN KEEN commented Permalink

Keith -- As somebody who has been working at home for 17 years, I'd be curious to hear about the tools you've used to collaborate with your colleagues. Have they changed significantly in that time? Has it become easier over the years to stay in contact?

 
Grant - I love the experiment. Maybe next time try it on the golf course, with your cell phone connected to instant messaging and see if anybody notices :-) I'm hearing a lot of people echo your sentiments -- working at home is most productive, but coming into the office on occasion is also important, just for the face-to-face.
 
Ian - thanks for the link. Presenteeism is a big issue to overcome with home work. Perhaps it can be countered by increasing collaboration in other mediums-- frequent posts in a work team room or Connections community?
 
Megan - it's funny that no home worker ever seems to want to recreate the office environment in their own home -- florescent lights and cubicles. I can't think why! :-)

12 Keith Brooks commented Permalink

In my case, not much has changed, still use Notes, Domino, ST, Quickr and now Connections for personnel.
RDP for client work or VPN access.
Now I also have more web based things like Twitter, Facebook et al but actually not much has changed technologically.
Ok, speed is MUCH MUCH faster now than back then.

13 commented Trackback

[Trackback] [...] Read More here: www-304.ibm.com/connections/blogs/socialbusiness/entry/are_you_less_productive_when_working_from_home1?lang=en_us [...]

Add a Comment Add a Comment